 |
 |
|
Fact Pack
Protecting Wolves has numerous ecological benefits.
-
Competition from wolves helps to control populations of coyotes and other
small predators, which in turn benefits the small mammals and birds that
coyotes usually prey on.
|
-
Wolves leave their 'leftovers' for other animals to eat - which can increase
the biodiversity of the ecosystem.
|
-
Wolves improve the gene pools of the species they prey on by taking slow,
weak or sick individuals.
|
-
Wolves can help protect plant populations by controlling the population
sizes of large herbivores and grazers - in Yellowstone, Aspen populations
are recovering, apparently due to the effect of wolf predation on Elk.
|
Most Americans support wolf conservation
efforts.
|
-
Nationally, one opinion poll conducted by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service showed that almost 60% of Americans support wolf conservation efforts.
|
-
A 2002 article summarizing public attitudes about wolves showed that 61%
of the general population had a positive view of wolves.3
|
-
A 1998 nation-wide poll conducted by the National Wildlife Federation2 showed
that 76% of Americans express support for the wolf reintroduction effort
and 84% of Americans support the broader goal of returning endangered species
to native habitats on public lands.
|
Wolves are not vicious killing machines.
-
There are no documented instances of a healthy, wild wolf killing a human
being in North America.
|
-
Ensuring the presence of larger carnivores, including wolves, has been
shown to increase biodiversity in general. Wolves can have a positive impact
on small animals, scavengers, vegetation, and even their prey.
|
Preserving wolves is good for the economy.
-
Interest in wolves can have positive impacts on tourism. The
International
Wolf Center in Ely, Minnesota receives 40-45,000 visitors a year to
its education center, and to the town of
Ely.
Economic analysis1 indicates that
the International Wolf Center generates around $3 million dollars annually
and created as many as 66 new jobs in a town of 3,724 inhabitants.
-
A 1997 study on the economic impact of Red Wolf recovery in the southeast
found that the presence of wolves would be incentive for tourists to visit
the region, thus stimulating the local economies. The regional impact of
wolf related tourism is expected to average at least $35 million per year.
4
-
Negative
impacts from wolf reintroduction on the economy of the northern Rockies
has been negligible.
|
|
1.Schaller. The Ecocenter as Tourist Attraction:
Ely and the International Wolf Center, University of Minnesota. 1995.
2. Lauer, Lalley. America
Wants Wolves to Stay! Victoria Inc. 1998.
3. Williams, CK, G. Ericsson, and TA Heberlein. "A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction
(1972-2000)." WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN. 2002.
4. Rosen, W. Red Wolf Recovery
in Northeastern North Carolina and the Great Smoky Mountains National Park:
Public Attitudes and Economic Impacts. Report submitted to the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. |
State Environmental Resource Center
- 106 East Doty Street, Suite 200 - Madison, WI 53703
Phone: 608/252-9800 - Email: info@serconline.org
|
|