|
Home > Policy
Issues > Transportation Funding > Talking Points |
 |
Talking Points
The sample legislative options in this package will:
- Give more funds and greater control to local, regional, and
metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs);
- Encourage alternative transportation projects, like mass transit
and pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements;
- Reduce congestion;
- Help to improve air quality; and
- Make cities safer and easier in which to get around.
Local planning is smart planning.
- Local and metropolitan areas suffer from a variety of transportation-related
problems, like deteriorating air quality, increasing congestion,
and dilapidating roadways.
- States cannot always adequately address local and metropolitan
transportation-related problems.
- Local control produces a more balanced and holistic transportation
network because decision makers are aware of local needs and problems
and experience them on a daily basis.
- Local planning organizations and MPOs are more than twice as
likely to spend available funds on mass transit, pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure improvements, and other alternative transportation
projects.(1)
Current approaches to transportation funding are outdated and
out of touch with current public demands.
- The nation’s highway system was first created in the post-World
War II era.
- The majority of states have adopted little or no reform to the
transportation funding provisions created during that period.
- Transportation problems have evolved dramatically since the
birth of the highway system, and states need to update existing
laws to reflect changes resulting from continued growth and address
the challenges that face local and metropolitan areas.
- For the first time since World War II, transit ridership has
outpaced the growth in driving for 5 straight years and is at
its highest level since 1960.(2)
- Despite the shift in public demand, local and metropolitan planning
organizations directly receive less than 6 percent of available
federal funds.
|
Sources:
(1) Puentes, Robert and Linda Bailey. “Improving Metropolitan
Decision Making in Transportation: Greater Funding and Devolution
for Greater Accountability.” Washington, D.C.: The Brookings
Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, October 2003.
15 February 2005 <http://www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/es/urban/publications/200310_Puentes.pdf>.
(2) Katz, Bruce, Robert Pentes and Scott Bernstein. “TEA-21
Reauthorization: Getting Transportation Right for Metropolitan America.”
Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan
Policy, March 2003. 14 February 2005 <http://www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/es/urban/publications/tea21.pdf>.
|
This package was last updated on February 17, 2005. |
|