Background
Citing a need for fairness and environmental protection, various
interests have been calling for pay-as-you-drive (PAYD) insurance
for many years. Several pilot programs testing the feasibility and
benefits of PAYD have been, or soon will be, initiated.
Progressive and “Autograph”(1)
The Progressive Casualty Insurance Corporation began testing its
usage-based auto insurance product “Autograph” in Houston
in 1998, and expanded the program throughout Texas in August of
1999. A unique rating methodology developed and patented by Progressive,
using retrofitted Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) and cellular
technology, was used to record and collect data. Data was collected
by an independent vendor, as required by Texas law, and forwarded
to Progressive for billing. Drivers were charged according to amount
of time, time of day, and place of driving. This method allowed
drivers to save money by spending less time in their vehicles, especially
during congestion periods when trips take the most time.
The test confirmed that usage-based (PAYD) insurance was technologically
feasible and popular with participants, who saved an average of
25% versus what they were previously paying. Customers liked having
control over their insurance costs.
Progressive discontinued selling new policies in April 2000, but
continued to service existing usage-based policies until July 15,
2001, when the company discontinued the program. The costs involved
were prohibitive because of the small number of policy holders.
However, according to Mauricio Duarte, Internet Service Specialist
with Progressive, the company is committed to the concept, but has
no immediate plans to reintroduce the product.
Norwich Union Corporation (UK)(2)(3)
Norwich Union, a United Kingdom insurance company, recruited 5,000
customers to participate in a pilot program which began in late
2003 to test the benefits of and demand for PAYD insurance and associated
services.
The company will collect data using a “black box” installed
in participant vehicles, a technology developed by IBM. Using technology
similar to that used for mobile phones, the “black boxes”
will relay to Norwich Union information about how often, when, and
where a vehicle is driven. Monthly insurance payments will be calculated
from that data. Policyholders will pay a monthly premium to cover
the basics like fire and theft protection, and then will pay itemized
add-on charges reflecting vehicle usage.
Norwich Union believes this method of calculation will ultimately
result in fairer premiums and provide the customer greater control,
flexibility, and choice. Response to the online registration for
the pilot has been overwhelming and the company expects to receive
more than the required number of volunteers.
According to Robert Ledger, program director for Norwich Union,
“Customers choosing Pay As You Drive™ insurance will
benefit from individual premiums based on how often, when and where
they actually used their cars. Motorists would receive a fairer
deal as this initiative provides them with the opportunity to really
be in the driving seat when it comes to controlling their premiums.”
By December 2004, Norwich Union and IBM expect to have tracked
the driving habits of the pilot study’s 5,000 participants.
Armed with these insights, IBM and Norwich Union plan to conduct
usage and risk analysis studies to refine the insurance billing
process and create a comprehensive business model. The companies
hope to launch Pay As You Drive™ in the UK in 2005.
Georgia(4)
The Federal Highway Administration’s Value Pricing Pilot
Program is providing funding for a before/after PAYD insurance simulation
pilot in Georgia. After gathering baseline data the pilot will provide
payments to participating households that reduce vehicle mileage
(VMT), and thus their crash exposure. In a second phase, payments
will be provided to households that reduce all crash exposure factors
(VMT, risky driving behavior, and driving in dangerous corridors
and at risky times).
Massachusetts(5)
The Environmental
Insurance Agency, a subsidiary of the Conservation Law Foundation,
has partnered with the Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation and is
offering policies to members of the Transportation Alliance, a “green”
buying club that brokers discounts on environmentally-friendly products.
They are attempting to accumulate data proving that low-mileage
drivers cost less to insure, with the intent of petitioning insurance
regulators in Massachusetts to authorize a PAYD program.
Other Initiatives(6)
A number of groups, including the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Environmental Defense, and the Conservation Law Foundation,
are working together to form a national cooperative of insurance
providers who are willing to establish steep discounts for low-mileage
drivers – a fairly significant step toward PAYD.
The EPA is also developing a voluntary government-industry partnership
to offer recognition and support to PAYD insurance-offering companies.
The EPA has also been considering giving out green “stamps
of approval” to companies that offer PAYD policies, a program
similar to the one which recognizes energy-efficient products with
an Energy Star® label.
Regulatory Issues(7)
A 2003 survey by the Georgia Institute of Technology reported that
some states’ insurance regulations prohibit insurance companies
from selling per-mile premiums. Their survey of insurance commissioners
in 43 states found that 63% believe state regulations would not
prohibit PAYD insurance, while 37% reported their states’
regulations would prohibit PAYD insurance options.
The insurance commissioners who responded to the survey offered
reasons why their state regulations prohibit PAYD policies, and
research indicates that most of these could be overcome by a properly
structured PAYD program. In West Virginia, for example, regulations
require that customers be insured at all times, and PAYD might mean
that drivers would lose coverage if they exceeded the prepaid number
of miles. To overcome this barrier, an insurer could structure a
PAYD program to ensure that participating drivers are never uninsured.
How to Implement
The National Organization of Women posts model
legislation which mandates that insurance companies must offer
consumers a choice between time-based and mile-based premiums. This
is intended to serve as a model for federal legislation but could
easily be modified to serve as a state model. There are some difficulties
in mandating PAYD options for private insurance companies in a particular
state. Insurance companies in any given state are unlikely to be
affiliated with the state, and most private companies dislike state
law interference in how they offer private services.
In addition, pilot studies of PAYD programs indicate they carry
an initial higher cost to insurance companies, a burden that the
state may be reluctant to mandate. However, most pilot study reports
indicate that the higher costs are associated with the installation
and monitoring of new technologies like GPS or “black box”
systems to measure mileage and driving location. These costs are
unnecessary if insurance companies opt to allow licensed, independent
mechanics to verify mileage. This would also solve the problems
that arise from customers’ privacy concerns relating to systems
that monitor their driving. The cost of this option would be negligible
to the insurance company, similar to the cost of other private monitoring
services like gas gauging in private residences.
Most existing or proposed legislation regarding PAYD either simply
allows insurance companies to offer mile-based rating plans in addition
to time-based rating plans (Texas,
Georgia)
or offers tax incentives for companies that do offer the choice
(Oregon)
in order to offset the initial higher costs of implementing PAYD
programs. The sample bill in this package is modeled after Oregon’s
HB 2043. |