Fact Pack
Children’s Special Vulnerability to Environmental Risks
Information for this section provided by the Child
Proofing Our Communities Campaign: Creating
Safe Learning Zones.
The central theme of a pivotal report by the National Academy of
Sciences in 1993 was that children are not “little adults”
– a fact already known to legions of parents, teachers, and
others worldwide.(1) Infants and children
are different from adults because they are growing and developing.
Environmental Hazards Affect Children Differently Than Adults
Their bodies are not fully mature, and therefore may not be capable
of detoxifying certain harmful compounds. The very nature of children’s
behavior – highly curious and physical – can also put
them at increased risk. That children are uniquely vulnerable to
environmental hazards is well established in scientific literature.
In fact, the World Health Organization recommended more than a decade
ago that, “when health risks from chemicals are evaluated,
the special characteristics of infants and children must be recognized.”(2)
Greater Exposure
Pound for pound, children breathe more air, drink more water, and
consume more food than adults. This higher rate of intake means
that children will receive higher doses of whatever contaminants
are present in the air, water, or food. In addition, infants have
a relatively greater surface area of skin than adults, thereby increasing
their potential dermal absorption of certain compounds.
Differential Intake
Children, aged one to five years old, eat 3 - 4 times more per unit
of body weight than the average adult American.(3)
The average one-year-old drinks 21 times more apple juice and 11 times
more grape juice, and eats 2 - 7.5 times more grapes, bananas, apples,
pears, carrots, and broccoli than the average adult.(3)
Infants and children drink more than 2.5 times as much water daily
as adults do as a percentage of body weight.(4)
(An infant living solely on formula consumes about one-seventh of
his/her own weight of water each day, which corresponds to approximately
three gallons, or thirty-five cans of soda, for a 155-pound adult
man.(2))
The air intake of a resting infant is twice that of an adult under
the same conditions. A typical newborn weighs one-twentieth of the
weight of an adult male, but the infant’s surface area is
one-eighth as great.(2) Therefore, the
total area of skin that could be exposed to a chemical (by swimming
or bathing in polluted water or rolling in dirt) is 2.5 times as
great per unit of body weight in the infant as in the adult.(2)
Childhood Behavior
The typical nature of children’s behavior also increases
their exposure to environmental
toxicants. An infant frequently explores objects by placing them
in his or her mouth. This
common hand-to-mouth behavior increases an infant’s ingestion
of substances in soil,
household dust, floors and carpets, and on the objects themselves.
In recognition of this,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed
assuming that children, aged three to five years old, put their
hands to their mouths an average of 1.5 times per hour.(5)
As children grow, their endless curiosity and lack of fear can
further increase their exposure to environmental hazards. With considerable
physical energy, children can explore locations without regard for
the consequences of their actions.
At rest, children’s breathing rates are faster than those
of adults, and children’s greater levels of physical activity
can increase their breathing rates even further.
Children often play at ground level. In contrast, an adult’s
common breathing zone is four to six feet above the floor. Children
will receive greater inhalation and dermal exposure to chemicals
present on floors, carpet, grass, or dirt. Also, heavier chemicals
such as lead and particulates will settle and accumulate in the
air at ground level.(2)
Increased Susceptibility
Human infants and children differ from adults not only in their
size but also in the relative immaturity of their biochemical and
physiological functions. Childhood is characterized by rapid physical
and mental growth. Accordingly, certain organs may not be fully
developed and may be more vulnerable to injury. Children absorb,
metabolize, and excrete compounds differently than adults.
Rapid Growth and Development
The fetus is particularly sensitive to environmental toxicants.(6)
Chemicals can affect the children born to women exposed during pregnancy,
while the women remain unaffected. For example, the children of women
from Michigan who ate 2 - 3 meals of fish contaminated with PCBs per
month for six years before pregnancy had lower birth weights, memory
deficits at seven months and four years of age, and cognitive deficits
persisted at eleven years of age.(7) In
Iraq, children born to women who, during pregnancy, inadvertently
ate seed grain treated with mercury to prevent fungus had severe developmental
and mental deficits.(8)
An infant gains weight more rapidly during the first 4 - 6 months
after birth than at any other time during his or her life.(2)
Typical newborns double their weight during the first 5 - 6 months
and, by their first birthday, will weigh 3 times their birth-weight.(3)
The growth of integral parts of the central nervous system (brain)
and the immune system (thymus) proceeds most rapidly in the first
six years of life. At age six, a child’s weight is only about
30 percent of an adult’s, but the child’s thymus is
approximately the size of the adult’s, and the brain is about
80 percent of adult size.(9)
Many organs are not fully developed at birth and continue developing
for years. The nervous system, lungs, immune system, and reproductive
organs undergo extensive growth and development in
utero and throughout infancy and early childhood. For example,
sex organ development is not complete until puberty; myelination,
the insulating of the nerve fibers of the brain, is not complete
until adolescence; and the alveoli, or terminal air sacs in the
lung where oxygen from the air enters the blood, continue to increase
in number until adolescence.(10)
Differential Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion
Infants’ and children’s pathways of absorption, metabolism,
and excretion of compounds are different from those of adults.(1)
In some instances, children may be more susceptible than adults,
due to their increased rates of absorption or decreased rates of
elimination of foreign compounds; in other cases, the opposite may
be true. Children will absorb about 50 percent of lead ingested,
whereas adults will absorb only about 10 to 15 percent.(11)
Kidneys are the principal pathway for elimination of most chemicals
from the body. At birth an infant’s kidney’s filtration
rate is a fraction of adult values, and by age one the rate is at
adult levels.(10)
Recent molecular epidemiological data indicate that infants and
children retain greater amounts of certain environmental toxicants.
In a study of Polish newborns and their mothers, biomarkers, levels
of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-induced DNA damage, were
measured. Among newborns exposed to PAHs in
utero, the level of DNA damage was comparable to the level
in their mothers, even though the estimated dose to the fetus was
one-tenth of that to the mother. Similarly, in young children (under
two years of age), levels of an indicator of exposures to PAHs (1-hydroxypyrene
glucuronide) in urine were higher than in their mothers.(12)
Another study investigated PCB levels in individuals residing on
a Mohawk reservation downstream from pollution sources on the St.
Lawrence River. PCBs were found in the breast milk and urine of
women who ate fish caught in the river. The PCB concentrations in
the urine of breast-fed infants were 10 times higher than in the
urine of their mothers.(12)
Longer Lifetimes
Children have more years of future life than most adults. Therefore,
they have more time to develop any chronic diseases that might be
triggered by early environmental exposures. Many diseases initiated
by chemical hazards require decades to develop. Early childhood
exposure to certain carcinogens or toxicants may be more likely
to lead to disease than the same exposures experienced later in
life.(13)
|
Sources:
(1) National Research Council: Committee on Pesticides in the Diets
of Infants and Children: Board on Argriculture and Board on Environmental
Studies and Toxicology. “Pesticides in the Diets of Infants
and Children.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993.
(2) International Programme on Chemical Safety. “Principles
for Evaluating Health Risks From Chemicals During Infancy and Early
Childhood: The Need for a Special Approach.” Geneva: World Health
Organization, 1986.
(3) Wiles, R. and C. Campbell. “Pesticides in Children’s
Food.” Environmental Working Group, 1993.
(4) Plunkett, L.M., D. Turnbull and J.V Rodricks. “Differences
Between Adults and Children Affecting Exposure Assessment.”
In Similarities and Differences Between Children
and Adults: Implications for Risk Assessment Volume 1. Edited
by P.S. Guzelian, C.J. Henry and S.S. Olin. Washington: ILSI Press,
pp. 79-94.
(5) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Residential Exposure Assessment
Work Group. “Draft - Standard Operating Procedures for Residential
Exposure Assessments.” 18 July 1997.
(6) Birnbaum, L.S. “Endocrine Effects of Prenatal Exposures
to PCBs, Dioxins, and Other Xenobiotics: Implications for Policy and
Future Research.” Environmental Health
Perspectives 102.8 (1994): 676-679. Y.L. Guo et al. “Growth
Abnormalities in the Population Exposed In Utero
and Early Postnatally to Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Dibenzrofurans.”
Environmental Health Perspectives 105
(Supplement 6) (Sept. 1995): 117-122.
(7) Jacobson, J.L. et al. “The Transfer of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs) and Polybrominated Biphenyls (PBBs) across the Human Placenta
and into Maternal Milk.” American Journal
of Public Health 74 (1984): 378-9. J. Jacobson et al. “Effects
of In Utero Exposure to Polychlorinated
Biphenyls and Related Contaminants on Cognitive Functioning in Young
Children.” Pediatrics 116 (1990):
38-45. S.W. Jacobson et al. “The Effect of Intrauterine PCB
Exposure on Visual Recognition Memory.” Child
Dev 56 (1985): 853-60. J.L. Jacobson et al. “Effects
of Exposure to PCBs and Related Compounds on Growth and Activity in
Children.” Neurotoxicol. Teratol.
12 (1990): 319-26.
(8) Gilbert, S. G. and K. Grant-Webster. “Neurobehavioral Effects
of Developmental Methyl-Mercury Exposure.” Environmental
Health Perspectives 103 (Supplement 6) (Sept. 1995): 135-142.
(9) Sonawane, B. and R. Beliles. “The Susceptibility of Children
to Immunotoxic and Neurotoxic Agents.” Poster Abstract, lst
National Research Conference on Children’s Environmental Health,
Children’s Environmental Health Network. February 21-23, 1997,
Washington, D.C.
(10) Bearer, C.F. “How are children different from adults?”
Environmental Health Perspectives 103
(Supplement 6) (Sept. 1995): 7-12.
(11) Royce, S. and H. Needleman. “Case Studies in Environmental
Medicine: Lead Toxicity.” Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, 1995.
(12) Perera, F. “Molecular Epidemiology: Insights Into Cancer
Susceptibility, Risk Assessment and Prevention.” JNCI
(Volume 88) (17 April 1996): 496-509.
(13) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ATSDR, and Bureau
of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, New York State Department
of Health. “Exposure to PCBs from Hazardous Waste Among Mohawk
Women and Infants at Akwesasne.” |