Home > State Info > Innovative Legislation > Carbon Taxing
Back to Policy Issues Package

ISSUE: CARBON TAXING

States play an important role in formulating policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. State emissions of carbon dioxide, the most important greenhouse gas, are significant on a global scale – many states individually emit more carbon than some industrialized countries. The major man-made source of carbon dioxide is the combustion of fossil fuels; also a leading cause of urban smog and acid rain. Carbon taxes are an attractive means of protecting the climate by reducing carbon emissions while also raising revenues for states facing difficult budget constraints.

By increasing fossil fuel prices, the tax encourages more efficient use of energy and stimulates development of renewable technologies. By changing relative prices, it encourages a shift in consumption from coal and oil to cleaner-burning natural gas and other environmentally friendly alternatives.

Below you will find information about states’ experiences with carbon tax and tax shifting proposals.

California

The 1997 Global Climate Change Report: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Strategies for California, a report by the California Air Review Board, recommended that a carbon tax be imposed on vehicular emissions in the state.

Maryland

In 2000, Maryland Governor Paris Glendenning issued an executive order establishing the Energy Task Force. This panel was charged with examining methods for reducing energy-related air and water pollution throughout the state and with submitting a comprehensive package of energy alternatives to the governor. A carbon tax is among the ideas being considered, along with numerous other green taxes. A copy of the task force’s report can be found by clicking here.

Minnesota

In 1990, the Minnesota legislature requested a report from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) and the Department of Natural Resources on carbon dioxide emissions in Minnesota and incentives to reduce them. In 1991, the legislature formally established a tree planting program, Minnesota ReLeaf, and requested a further report from the PCA with an implementation plan and recommendations for a fee structure. The PCA recommended 54 cents per ton of carbon tax to generate revenues for tree planting. In 1992, Senator Morse's bill called for a $6 tax per ton of carbon emissions. In 1993, a similar bill called for a $2 per ton tax on carbon, which would have raised about $50 million statewide per year. For further discussion of Minnesota green taxes see David Morris, Green Taxes. Institute for Local Self-Reliance. Minneapolis, MN. July 1994. 

A bill to impose a $50 per ton carbon tax on energy producers and consumers, with a corresponding reduction in income and business taxes, was introduced in the 1997-1998 session of the Minnesota state legislature. HF 1190 was scuttled by powerful energy interests in the state despite numerous reports suggesting that the bill would have economically benefited the large majority of the state’s individuals and businesses. 

Oregon

In 1999, the Oregon Environmental Council introduced a bill to establish a tax shifting task force. HB 2473, sponsored by Representative Bill Witt (R-Beaverton), would create an Environmental Tax Study Commission to develop specific proposals for implementing green taxes in Oregon over the next 10 years, including possibly a carbon tax.

Texas

HB 2479 was introduced in 1997. The bill imposed a pollution tax on facilities in the state that emitted more than 1000 tons of one or more regulated pollutants, including CO2. The tax was assessed at $100/ton. Revenues from the tax were to be dedicated to the Texas public school system, along with a corresponding reduction in local property taxes that had been traditionally used to fund schools.

Vermont

In 1997, Vermont’s governor issued an Executive Order establishing the Vermont Committee to Ensure Clean Air. The panel was asked to submit a wide range of proposals to improve the air quality in Vermont and reduce the total amount of pollution being emitted within the state. A carbon tax was among the options that the panel considered when it issued its Comprehensive Energy Report in 1998.


The SERC project has been discontinued due to lack of funding. We apologize, but it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to respond to requests for information about the material posted on this site.