Home > Wildlines Archives > Wildlines, Volume III, Number 9
Volume III, Number 9
March 1, 2004
A publication of the State Environmental Resource Center (SERC) bringing you the most important news on state environmental issues from across the country.
 
NEWS FROM THE STATES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aquatic Invasive Species
Illinois Bill Would Require Residents Be Notified of Pollutants
ALEC's Pesticide Preemption Act
 
New Jersey: Luxury Homebuyers May Pay New Tax
Colorado Preparing to Study Wolf Management
Virginia: Dam Removal Aids Wildlife Migration
Arizona and Maine Losing Rural Land
Utah Bill to Encourage Water Conservation
Washington: Plan Would Create Eco-Terror Registry
California Wetlands at Risk
States Consider Appliance Efficiency Standards
Midwest Coalition of Fishing Groups Backs Mercury Reduction
Washington Bill on Cruise Ship Wastewater Dies
Washington Senate Panel Considers Bill on Electronic Waste
Aquatic Invasive Species

Invasive species are non-native species that wreak environmental and economic havoc in an ecosystem beyond their native range. Experts estimate that invasive species cost the United States more than $135 billion annually. Aquatic invasive species, such as the zebra mussel, sea lamprey, Eurasian water milfoil and round goby, have reduced game fish populations, destroyed boat engines, blocked industrial water intake systems, reduced property values, made swimming areas unusable, and severely altered natural ecosystems. Invasive species are difficult and expensive to control because they reproduce and spread quickly. Control programs use a variety of methods, but prevention is the most cost-effective and beneficial approach. States are taking steps to control the spread of exotic species within their borders and to prevent the introduction of new invaders from other states. As they move between bodies of water, boaters sometimes inadvertently spread invasive species. Education and inspection efforts can limit this activity. For more information on how your state can curtail the spread of aquatic invasive species, visit: http://www.serconline.org/aquaticInvasives.html. For related information on this topic, visit: http://www.serconline.org/ballast/index.html and http://www.serconline.org/invasives/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top
 
Illinois Bill Would Require Residents Be Notified of Pollutants (Daily Herald 2/23)
http://www.dailyherald.com/search/main_story.asp?intID=380402

Illinois lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to warn local residents of pollution hazards in their area. The introduction of the Toxic Chemical Disclosure Act comes after Lisle, Illinois, residents discovered that the state knew their water was polluted with trichloroethylene and failed to warn them of the danger. Shawn Collins, an attorney representing Lisle families affected by the incident said, "The awful truth in Illinois is that there's a conspiracy of silence between polluters and some in government to keep secret serious environmental problems." In another case, residents in Downers Grove were not notified that toxic chemicals had seeped into an aquifer that supplies their water. Downers Grove residents have complained of adverse health effects and decreased property values. The new bill, backed by Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn, would require the IEPA to notify residents of environmental cleanups or investigations near their homes via mail notices and postings in newspapers and online.
back to top
 
ALEC's Pesticide Preemption Act

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate-controlled advocacy group, is circulating legislation throughout the country that would eliminate a local government's ability to control pesticide "registration, notification of use, advertising and marketing, distribution, applicator training and certification, storage, transportation, disposal, disclosure of confidential information, or product composition." This legislation leaves communities defenseless against the risks of toxic pesticide exposure from unsafe application methods, poisonous ingredients, and genetic crop modifications. Most alarmingly, the bill would even limit a community's right to know about such risks. Keeping communities in the dark is part of a system of pesticide regulation that ALEC calls "safe, effective, and scientifically sound." We know better. For more information on this issue, visit: http://pesticide.net/insider/insider.aspx. For more information about ALEC's model bills, see: http://www.serconline.org/alecIndex.html.
back to top
 
New Jersey: Luxury Homebuyers May Pay New Tax (Bergen Record 2/26)
http://sierraactivist.org/article.php?sid=41537

New Jersey Gov. McGreevey's new budget includes a 1 percent real estate transfer tax on homes worth $1 million or more and would raise $24 million for the state over the next fiscal year. Luxury home builders say it imposes another closing fee on homebuyers. Proponents say homebuyers could get around the tax by structuring their purchase in stages, but that it's a step in the right direction for property tax fairness in the state. The money raised will go to the state treasury, not to a dedicated source, but will help fund property tax relief measures. The governor has been a vocal opponent of sprawl throughout his tenure, but made no reference to land use in regards to the proposed real estate tax.
back to top
 
Colorado Preparing to Study Wolf Management (San Francisco Chronicle 2/23)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/02/23/state2106EST7880.DTL

The Colorado Division of Wildlife is considering its options for wolf management as the state faces inevitable wolf migration from other states. Wolves have been sighted just north of the Colorado-Wyoming border. Colorado's native wolves were found in every county in Colorado until a bounty program in the 1930s virtually wiped them out. The division thinks they need to coordinate with federal officials and develop a plan before people take wolf management into their own hands. One wolf advocacy group thinks that fully reintroducing the controversial carnivores might be the best way to ensure their success in the state. Over the past decade, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reintroduced gray wolves in Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, and Arizona. Polls show strong support for wolf reintroduction in Colorado. By the current timeline, a management plan will be in place by the end of this year. For more information on wolf preservation, visit: http://www.serconline.org/wolfpreservation/index.html.
back to top
 
Virginia: Dam Removal Aids Wildlife Migration (LA Times 2/24) http://www.latimes.com/news/science/environment/la-na-dam24feb24,1,3181666.story?coll=la-news-environment

Army explosive experts blasted open a 130-foot section of the Embrey Dam on the Rappahannock River in Virginia this week. The demolition is symbolic of a growing trend of communities rallying around efforts to get rid of dams, many of which are no longer needed for power, drinking water, or flood control. The Embrey was the largest of at least 137 dams that have been removed since 1999, according to American Rivers, an environmental group that tracks restoration projects. Its destruction was significant because it reestablished the longest free-flowing river -- 184 miles -- into the Chesapeake Bay, reopening traditional migrations of American shad, blueback herring, alewife, and other fish that live in the bay and the Atlantic Ocean but return to freshwater to spawn. The restoration project follows the pattern of many other rivers, from California to Maine, over recent years. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which primarily is known for construction projects that manage rivers, has found a new role in helping bring rivers back to their natural states. U.S. Senator John Warren, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was able to secure from Congress the $10 million need for the project. The Corps will destroy the rest of the dam within the next few years and rebuild the banks of the river.
back to top
 
Arizona and Maine Losing Rural Land (Arizona Republic 2/27; Kennebec Journal 2/27)
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0227lostfarms27.html
http://www.centralmaine.com/news/local/447555.shtml

Recently conducted studies and surveys show declining amounts of rural land in Arizona and Maine. Arizona lost almost a third of its farm and ranch land over the past quarter-century, 12 million acres in all, or nearly 55 acres every hour, according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture census. Much of the land was converted to build homes and businesses in urbanizing areas around Phoenix, Tucson, and Pinal County. Some was converted to low-density ranchette-style subdivisions in rural areas. As the land was disappearing, the number of farms actually increased during the 1978-2002 census period. The number of small farms more than doubled, while the number of large farms, decreased by half. Farms owned by families or individuals grew, offsetting a decline in the number of corporate farms. In Maine, a study revealed the state needs more money for its Land for Maine's Future Program to keep the state's shoreline and farm fields from being purchased by private landowners. A study released last week shows that rural land in Maine is being converted to other uses faster than in other states. According to the report, authored by researchers at the University of Southern Maine and the University of Maine, in the last 20 years, Maine has lost more than 70,000 acres of land that had been used to produce feed for livestock. For more information on how your state can conserve valuable rural areas, visit: http://www.serconline.org/conservationfunding/index.html.
back to top
 
Utah Bill to Encourage Water Conservation (Salt Lake Tribune 2/27)
http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Feb/02272004/utah/142999.asp

HB 71, a Utah bill to encourage water agencies to develop sound water conservation policies, was unanimously approved by the state Senate on February 26th. The bill is now waiting for the governor's signature. Utah has required water suppliers to submit conservation plans to the state's Division of Water Resources since 1998, but that law has been ignored by many large suppliers because it fails to provide penalties. HB 71 would not allow any loans or grants to be dispersed to water suppliers who fail to submit a conservation plan. "We now we have a substantive law that will save water," said Erica Thoen, of the Utah Rivers Council. "But this is just the beginning of a long road for Utah. Long-term conservation planning is essential to long-term water savings and taxpayer dollar savings." For more information on water conservation issues, visit: http://www.serconline.org/waterconservation/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top
 
Washington: Plan Would Create Eco-Terror Registry (Seattle Post-Intelligencer 2/26)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/162152_ecoterror26.html

A Senate budget proposal includes a $50,000 request to create a database of people and organizations allegedly involved in eco-terrorist activities. Specifically, "the Senate budget would provide $50,000 to the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to do 'an assessment of environmentally or politically motivated crimes against animal or natural resources facilities,' and to create a database with 'a list of persons and organizations involved in eco-terrorism activities.'" A similar proposal was contained in SB 6114, a bill introduced earlier this year, that failed to move forward due to the increased expense of enacting the stiffer penalties required by the legislation. The bill was modeled after the American Legislative Exchange Council's (ALEC) model bill entitled, "Animal and Ecological Terrorist Act." Critics of this request contend that state law does not define ecoterrorism and anyone could appear in the database. Supporters of the measure feel it is another tool for law enforcement to use. For more information on ALEC's Animal and Ecological Terrorist Act, visit: http://www.serconline.org/alec/alec21.html.
back to top
 
California Wetlands at Risk (San Francisco Chronicle 2/25)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/02/25/EDG3B56O7I1.DTL

The Bush administration has quietly redefined federal rules on wetlands and water-quality protection. The administration's action has removed from federal protection seasonal wetlands -- those that are non-navigable or dry for part of year. This equals 20 percent of the nation's -- and more than half of California's -- wetlands. Because California receives most of its rain and snow during the winter, many of its streams and lakes are dry for much of the year, while others are not navigable. It is these waters that are no longer provided the basic protections of the Clean Water Act. Wetlands play an important role in ensuring the public's health by acting as natural filters, which help remove contaminants and purify the water. With more than 20 million Californians depending on these seasonal or non-navigable waters for sources of potable water, the destruction of wetland areas will have grave consequences for the state. Given the serious threat to human health and the environment that the federal "guidance" creates, several states, including New York and Wisconsin, have introduced or passed legislation to require their state governments to provide the water protections formerly provided by the federal government. SB 1477, a bill expected to be introduced by Sen. Byron Sher, would fill in the loophole and help protect California's economy, public health, and its environment. For more information on how your state can protect wetlands, visit: http://www.serconline.org/wetlands/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top
 
States Consider Appliance Efficiency Standards (CONNPIRG and MASSPIRG updates 2/25)

Bills requiring that nine types of residential and commercial appliances meet higher energy efficiency standards have been introduced in nine states this year. The states include IL, PA, CT, NJ, RI, NC, MA, HI, and VT. In Connecticut, SB 145 sets efficiency standards that are achievable today. By 2010, the standards will reduce summertime peak energy demand by 65.5 megawatts. By 2020, the reduction will be 126 megawatts. The cost savings from this reduced energy usage amounts to $39.5 million by 2010 and $384.2 million by 2020. This reduced energy demand would reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power generation by 145,724 pounds per year by 2020. Standards and testing procedures for the efficiency standards already exist, meaning the state would not need to spend a lot of money creating new regulations to enforce the standards. In fact, estimates are that just one of the eight standards in the bill -- for transformers -- would save state government $450,000 per year in reduced energy costs. In Massachusetts, HB 4363 would require that all such products sold in the state after January 1, 2005, meet minimum energy efficiency standards. The bill would only set standards at levels that are already being met by appliances and equipment in the marketplace, and the appliances would pay back the efficiency investment in less than two years -- often in less than one. The bill also authorizes the adoption of efficiency standards for other appliances as a tool for the future. The bill has the potential to save Massachusetts consumers and businesses $1.5 billion over the next 20 years. For more information on energy efficiency standards, visit: http://www.serconline.org/efficiencystandards/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top
 
Midwest Coalition of Fishing Groups Backs Mercury Reduction (Post-Crescent 2/25)
http://www.wisinfo.com/postcrescent/news/archive/local_14883553.shtml

A coalition of fishing groups from six Midwestern states heavily affected by high mercury levels in fish has united to demand the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) take steps to ensure reduced mercury contamination. A letter to the EPA, co-signed by representatives from the fishing groups, was introduced as testimony at a national public hearing in Chicago to address proposed federal rules aimed at mercury emission reductions. According to EPA estimates, coal-burning power plants account for the vast majority of U.S. mercury emissions, emitting about 50 tons annually. In lakes and rivers, mercury reacts with bacteria to form methyl mercury, a neurotoxin that accumulates in the bodies of humans and wildlife and interferes in nervous system development. The federal Clean Air Act requires that mercury pollution controls be established by 2008, but the Bush administration's proposed plan would replace that requirement with regulations to reduce emissions from coal-fired power plants by 30 percent by 2010 and 70 percent by 2018. Representatives from Midwest states, which contain a large percent of the nation's coal-burning power plants, say the Bush plan doesn't go far enough. "A good plan, if implemented, would reduce mercury emissions by 90 percent by 2008," said Sam Washington, executive director of the Michigan United Conservation Clubs. For more information on reducing mercury contamination in your state, visit: http://www.serconline.org/mercury/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top
 
Washington Bill on Cruise Ship Wastewater Dies (Seattle Post Intelligencer 2/26)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/162146_cruise26.html

A measure to more tightly regulate pollution from cruise ships in Puget Sound has died in the legislative committee where it was introduced, but its chief sponsor vowed to try again. The measure would have imposed $25,000-a-day penalties against cruise ships that discharge a variety of wastes into state waters, including untreated sewage, sludge from ship toilets and sinks, and oily liquid from bilges. It would have allowed state inspectors onto ships. Opponents were concerned that the bill would conflict with federal law, which limits state regulation of waste discharges, and that it might prompt the cruise industry to stop calling in Seattle and go to Vancouver, B.C., instead, costing the Puget Sound area jobs. A memorandum of understanding between the state and the industry over waste discharges is also being negotiated. Environmentalists have opposed the memorandum, saying it doesn't have enough teeth in it. An agreement is supported by the industry, which opposed the bill and promised that, even without the legislation, it would reduce or avoid discharges to a greater extent here than elsewhere in the country. Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson said she'll try again to get a similar measure passed. "If the cruise industry follows the pattern in other states, they will end up breaking their memorandum of agreement, and I'll have all the ammunition I'll need to pass this bill," she said.
back to top
 
Washington Senate Panel Considers Bill on Electronic Waste (Seattle Post-Intelligencer 2/26) http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/162116_recycling26.html

Washington state lawmakers and environmentalists hope to start a recycling program for worn-out electronics. "If we don't do something, we'll have piles of computers just like we have piles of tires," said Rep. Mike Cooper, D-Edmonds, prime sponsor of a House measure to study electronics recycling. When initially proposed, the measure would have demanded that manufacturers develop and finance an electronics recycling program by 2006, but the proposal morphed into a bill requiring the Department of Ecology to research electronics recycling and report findings to the Legislature. Last year, Seattle residents were storing about 223,000 televisions, computers, and monitors, according to Chris Luboff, solid waste planning supervisor for Seattle Public Utilities. According to a King County survey last year, 25 percent of the county's residents, not including Seattle residents, have a computer they aren't using, and another 16 percent have a TV they aren't using. For more information on how your state can deal with electronic waste, see http://www.serconline.org/ewaste/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top

For more information about SERC, or to use our services, contact our national headquarters at:
State Environmental Resource Center
106 East Doty Street, Suite 200 § Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Phone: 608-252-9800 § Fax: 608-252-9828
Email: info@serconline.org