Home > State Info > Innovative Legislation > Environmentally & Socially Responsible Wood

ISSUE: ENVIRONMENTALLY AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE WOOD

Forests Are Threatened Worldwide

Concern over the loss and destruction of the world’s forests has taken many forms in the last few decades. From the debates of owl and logger in the Pacific Northwest of the United States to the highly publicized loss of tropical rainforests around the globe, forests have become an issue central to environmental agendas. The facts reveal that the great concern is warranted. The Rainforest Alliance reports that “the world’s forest area has now shrunk to 8.6 billion acres as a consequence of human exploitation – most of which occurred in the last 50 years.”(1) The use of unsustainable practices of consumption of wood and wood products affects more than just forests. Unsustainable consumption has led to a decrease in biodiversity, diminished the quality of watersheds, and eliminated animal habitat.

Wood Alternatives

Practices and products that minimize the amount of wood and wood products used are obvious solutions to reduce the loss of forest land. Practices that reduce the amount of wood used include using wood more sparingly, reusing wood salvaged from old structures, and recycling wood to be used in other products. The same actions can be utilized for paper and other wood products. However, due to improving technology it is possible for other materials to be viable and affordable alternatives to using wood. Some of these wood alternatives include using waste resources (such as tires, bottles, and cans), composite and engineered wood products, recycled plastic lumber, and non-wood fibers.

Increasingly, companies are adopting initiatives incorporating the above mentioned principles into their corporate policies. The list of companies adopting forest-friendly policies includes National Geographic Society, Patagonia and many Fortune 500 companies. To view the list in its entirety and for more information on wood alternatives visit ForestEthics.

Consumers Can Take Responsibility

Consumers and purchasers can have an impact on forest use through their purchasing power. To reduce the demand for lumber, consumers can purchase wood alternatives or use recycled wood. If these are not feasible, consumers can impact logging practices by choosing sustainably harvested timber. If consumers make it clear that they care about logging practices, forest owners and managers can gain a market advantage or price premiums if they are able to establish that they manage their land in a responsible fashion. Preference for industry and trade certified products can have an effect on their marketing strategies. It can be difficult to ascertain the origin of wood and wood products, however multiple certification schemes have been implemented so consumers have an easier time purchasing wood products that are “good.”

Certification Schemes

Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)

One certification scheme comes from the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). The FSC has made it easier to purchase wood and wood-related products that were grown and produced in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. The FSC strives to certify wood and other wood products from forests that are, “environmentally appropriate, socially viable, and economically viably managed.”(2) Other components of the FSC certification scheme include a limitation on the size of clear-cut forest land, detailed assessments of the landowners, and third-party auditing for verification. The FSC is especially applicable to the certification of tropical hardwoods that traditionally come from developing countries.

Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI)

Another certification scheme is the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) which was developed by the American Forest & Paper Association (AFPA). The SFI strives to certify wood and wood products that have been managed in a responsible manner. Representatives on the board include members of the paper industry, along with representatives from the environmental field including the President and CEO of the Nature Conservancy. SFI incorporates best management practices (BMPs) and independent third-party audits. The SFI is best applied to timber traditionally found in European and United States forests.

Other Certification Schemes

Other certification schemes include PEFC and CSA standards. Due to the number of certifications available, it is important to recognize that each standard has its unique qualities and attributes. When consumers and other individuals are looking into purchasing wood and other products, a through comparison is warranted. When constructing policies regarding the fiscal purchasing power of state governments the recognition of different certification schemes is recommended, due to the number and differing principals each cover. Several articles and reports have been done comparing the various certifications, including the following:

Legislation

Model Legislation

The Consumer’s Choice Council has assembled a guidebook that provides information on how cities and states can save forests through their purchasing power. Minimally, policies should address:

  • Environmentally Preferable Materials Purchasing Options (alternatives to wood)
  • Pulp & Paper Purchasing Options
  • Building Material Purchasing Options

The CCC has also assembled pertinent information into a model bill (Appendix 2, p. 16).

Currently there are laws in place that encourage purchasing policies that give preferential treatment to environmentally and socially responsible wood. Here are some of the laws already in place:

  • San Francisco Administrative Council Code Chapter 121
  • Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 2.28
  • Hartford County, MD County Code Section 41-19
  • Arizona Revised Statutes Title 34 Section 201J
  • New York Consolidated Laws Article 11 Section 165
  • Tennessee Code Ann. Section 4-3-1112

Click here for a complete list of the laws.

New York City Council Speaker introduced Int. No. 108 on April 10, 2002 seeking to amend the administrative code relating to the city’s contracts purchasing wood products and other materials. The legislation seeks to mandate the purchase of wood alternatives and if wood is determined to be the only viable purchase option it needs to be certified as coming from a socially responsible forest.

Current State Legislation

New York
SB 2094 and HB 5488 - These bills seek to establish a certified wood procurement pilot project, define “certified wood,” and dependent upon the results for the pilot wood procurement project, establish a pilot project for certified paper procurement.

The State Environmental Resource Center would like to thank the Consumer’s Choice Council for the handbook, “How to Save Forests Through Environmentally and Socially Responsible Procurement: A Handbook for Activists.”

Sources:
(1) Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “State of the World’s Forests 1997.” 1997. Rainforest Alliance: Rainforest Resources/Facts. 27 May 2003 <http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/resources/forest-facts.html>.
(2) “About FSC: Who Are We?” Forest Stewardship Council. 27 May 2003 <http://www.fscoax.org/html/who_are_we.html>.
This page was last updated on May 27, 2003.

The SERC project has been discontinued due to lack of funding. We apologize, but it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to respond to requests for information about the material posted on this site.