Home > State Info > Innovative Legislation > Clean Air Testing & Enforcement

ISSUE: CLEAN AIR TESTING AND ENFORCEMENT

Air pollution affects everyone. Rich or poor, man or woman, everyone needs to breathe, and polluted air affects every segment of society. Tons of soot, coal dust, sulfur, nitrogen oxide, carbon dioxide, and mercury are pumped into our atmosphere every year. When you think about it, it’s easy to see why we need strong laws to limit air pollution.

Existing State Law

California
In 2002, AB 1493 was ratified in both houses of the California legislature and signed into law by Governor Gray Davis. The bill gives California’s Air Resources Board the authority to set emissions standards that achieve the maximum feasible reduction in global warming pollution emitted by passenger vehicles. “Maximum feasibility” means a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions that is “capable of being successfully accomplished within a reasonable period of time, taking into account environmental, economic, social, and technological factors” and “economical to an owner or operator of a vehicle, taking into account the full life-cycle costs of the vehicle.” The regulations proposed in the bill would be adopted no later than Jan. 1, 2005, and go into effect no earlier than Jan. 1, 2006, and apply only to 2009 model-year automobiles.

Connecticut
HB 6365 was ratified by the Connecticut legislature in May 2002. The bill proposes to clean up Connecticut’s “sooty six,” the six dirtiest power plants in the state. The bill cuts the amount of sulfur dioxide released from the six plants.

North Carolina
The Ambient Air Quality Improvement Act of 1999 sets a goal of a 25% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions and seeks to encourage greater alternative fuel use by 2009. The bill prohibits the sale of gasoline with a sulfur content of 30 parts per million or higher, and initiates a motor vehicle emissions testing regime in 9 selected counties, with instructions on a progressive expansion of the counties to require testing.

Minnesota
Minnesota ratified its air toxics reduction plan during the 1999-2000 biennium. The air toxics reduction plan, HF 2524, requires Minnesota’s Pollution Control Agency to draft a plan for reducing ten different air toxins.  The plan should ensure that air toxins do not exceed health risk benchmarks around the state.

Introduced State Legislation

New Jersey
State Senator Joseph Coniglio of New Jersey introduced S 1293, a Senate version of Assembly bill A 1584 introduced last session in the New Jersey legislature. The bill proposes a risk assessment study of air pollution produced by major facilities around the state. Based on the health risk findings, the bill goes on to propose increases in air pollution monitoring at the aforementioned facilities. The pollutants to be studied include carbon monoxide, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, VOC, lead, and any and all other airborne contaminants. 

Florida
The Florida Clean Power Act, SB 2472, died in the Committee on Natural Resources. The bill would have placed Florida at the forefront of progressive power plant siting efforts in the states. It would have required Florida’s power plants to clean up their production of the “Four Pollutants,” a combination of dirty and destructive greenhouse gases common among the nation’s oldest power generation facilities.

 

For more information about SERC, or to use our services, contact our national headquarters at: